I’ve Got Mail: A Compatible Quote

Mike Davis writes from across the pond in Shropshire, England:

I was interested in the Gerry Mulligan advice. . .sound common sense. Here’s something in similar vein that Hampton Hawes once had to say (as passed on to me by Carol Kaye a few years ago) Quote: I don’t know about these young people today. They all want to analyze me, and I tell ‘em, ‘Don’t do it. . .don’t analyze; just listen, it doesn’t matter if I put a Rudebaker 9th with a Cabbage 13th. . .what really matters is that you listen; then if you like what you hear, enjoy the music. . .

Mike is the co-author (with Roger Hunter) of “Hampton Hawes: Bio-discography.”

Outrageous

This quote is floating all over the net and in lots of mail order catalogues without attribution — I rather like it:

I want to be an outrageous old woman who never gets called an old lady. I want to get leaner & meaner, sharp edged & earth colored, till I fade away from pure joy.

Granted, I have a ways to go…or at least I hope so.

Disturbing Documentary

Pianist Larry Goldings just sent me an email with a link to a very disturbing video documentary about 9/11. You can watch it online (though it is over an hour long), or you can download and watch at your leisure. I’ve only seen the first 13 1/2 minutes so far — it’s running as I post this — but I’d say it is worth checking out. It’s here on the Google film page. As Larry said, “It might change the way you view that day.”

Poetry & Music

April is National Poetry Month, but unless you are an avid poetry consumer, the celebration of this art form is likely to be eclipsed by other seasonal holidays. A poet and chapbook publisher in an article for the Boston Phoenix opined, “No wonder America’s National Poetry Month begins on April Fools’ Day!…Poetry is not now and never has been in America an art for the faint-hearted.” I wouldn’t characterize most Americans as faint-hearted, quite the contrary, but poetry does remain elusive to many. How many poems can you recite? (“Roses are red…” doesn’t count.) On the other hand, everyone sings songs.

When poet Dana Gioia became the Chairman of the National Endowment of the Arts in 2003, he noted that the mission of the NEA is not only to “foster excellence in the arts, but to bring art to all Americans.” He knows that this is not an easy task. As he explained it to a Philadelphia newspaper, “…there’s a difference between entertainment and art. Entertainment provides a series of predictable pleasures. It allows an audience to enter and leave more or less the same. Art affords at least the possibility of transformation. So we need to make some room for art in this overwhelmingly successful entertainment world.”

That possibility for transformation is afforded by an artist’s ability to embody his or her own transformative experience in a work of art – be it a poem, song, painting, or other art form.

Jazz pianist Fred Hersch is no stranger to poetry, having at the age of 18 been moved by Walt Whitman’s works — that was in the mid 1970s. Nearly thirty years later, Fred re-read “When I Heard at the Close of the Day” and was inspired to embody it as an instrumental piece. That one composition led Fred to an entire album based on Whitman’s poems — the orchestrations are for an 8 piece ensemble plus singers. The words are important: “…so many touchstone lines…words that represent to me what is the best about America,” Fred explained in an interview on NPR’s Morning Edition two years ago.

Fred talks also about the universality and timelessness of the poems’ meanings. “If you don’t have love, it’s just a bunch of stuff on your resume.” Long-form jazz-based works often receive critical attention, sometimes acclaim, but seldom do they resonate as positively with the audience. Happily, reports are that Hersch’s Leaves Of Grass is a crowd pleaser. In March of last year a New York Times concert review by Ben Ratliff concluded as follows:

“I have often experienced audiences palpably losing interest in long-form jazz pieces well before the finish. This one brought a full house to its feet.”

And in February of this year, Nate Chinen, also writing for The New York Times, reported:

“Buoyed by the success of “Leaves of Grass,” which has become one of the best-selling titles in his catalog, Mr. Hersch has plunged into another large-scale cross-disciplinary work. “It’s a song cycle for the stage with the poet Mary Jo Salter,” he said recently by phone from the MacDowell Colony in New Hampshire, where he was finishing a five-week residency. “The working title is ‘Hold Still!’ It’s a whole evening of about 18 songs loosely connected around the theme of photography.”

What is the secret alchemy that occurs when words are married to music? It might be said that music makes poetry more accessible to the average person, or that it touches the soul in ways that words alone cannot. This is not the first time I have pondered this question and a year or so ago I emailed my friend and noted arts critic Terry Teachout, asking him to comment on this question. [For those of you who may not yet know of Teachout, he is the drama critic of the Wall Street Journal and the music critic of Commentary, as well as contributor to publications such as the Washington Post, the New York Times, National Review, many other magazines and newspapers, and he blogs about the arts almost daily. He wrote back:

“When Igor Stravinsky saw the ballet that George Balanchine made out of his Movements for Piano and Orchestra, he said, ‘The performance was like a tour of a building for which I had drawn the plans but never explored the result.’ That must be what it feels like to have your words set to music by a good composer – it tells you something about your own writing that even you didn’t know.”

I wonder what Walt Whitman would have said upon hearing Hersch’s opus.

Know-It-All

“Man, you know, these young guys, they know all the modes, they know all the chords, they can play high and low and fast, and they can do amazing things, but the one thing they don’t know is how to leave the bone alone.” — attributed to Gerry Mulligan as quoted by Herb Alpert in a New Yorker piece by Nick Paumgarten (April 10, 2006, page 33).

Web Humor: Silly or Scary

The following, emailed to me by a friend who is not usually prone to disseminating such things, is either really silly or very scary. Perhaps both.

What Makes 100%? What does it mean to give MORE than 100%? Ever wonder about those people who say they are giving more than 100%? We have all been to those meetings where someone wants you to give over 100%. How can we achieve 103%? What makes up 100% in life?

Here’s a little mathematical formula that might help you answer these questions:

If:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z is represented as:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26.

Then:
H-A-R-D-W-O-R-K
8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = 98%

and
K-N-O-W-L-E-D-G-E
11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = 96%

But,
A-T-T-I-T-U-D-E
1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100%

On the other hand,
B-U-L-L-$-H-I-T
2+21+12+12+19+8+9+20 = 103%

AND, look how far ass kissing will take you.
A-S-S-K-I-S-S-I-N-G
1+19+19+11+9+19+19+9+14+7 = 118%

So, one can conclude with mathematical certainty that, while Hardwork and Knowledge will get you close, and Attitude will get you there, it’s the BULL$HIT and ASSKISSING that will put you over the top !!!

D-E-V-R-A, alone, only gets you 50%, but D-E-V-R-A-D-O-W-R-I-T-E gives you 144% of your minimum daily requirement. (Of course T-E-R-R-Y-T-E-A-C-H-O-U-T scores even higher — 179% — so what else is new? Cheers TT, here’s to you — may you remain in the stunned but happy state of grace to which I will continue to aspire.)

Spring Cleaning

Spring cleaning often means organizing piles of memorabilia — thank you who invented scanners. My latest cleaning/organizing/scanning project was a direct response to John’s desire to share with his family (all the way down to those great grandchild) the events surrounding the honor he received this past January. I scanned all the NEA Jazz Masters and IAJE memorabilia we collected, added in some photos (by Leroy Hamilton), audio and video clips, plus a little narration and a bunch of clippings to create a computer CD. When I decided to create the presentation as if it were a web site (so that anyone with a browser could open the files regardless of what computer system they use) my tech guru, Robert, suggested I use a free WYSIWYG (What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get) open source web authoring program called
NVU. Worked like a charm.

Speaking of a great use of photos, I recently took time to really check out Bill Crow’s new web site. WOW! Bill has posted beaucoup photos, and you really should browse the whole site so as not to miss Bill’s four-up head shot for commercial casting or the one with him riding off to a gig on his Lambretta motor scooter with his bass strapped on to the back. And don’t limit your meanderings to the photo pages, there are wonderful pix accompanying the bio and lots of links to other great sites. (Thanks, Bill, for including me on the links list.)

While I’m on the subject of visuals and spring cleaning, online re-designs are in the air: two of note this week are The New York Times and All About Jazz. In addition to a cleaner-looking more readable appearance, and the inclusion of more multimedia and podcasts, the other latest/hottest must-have “element” seems to be a listing (withy links) of the most popular stories — either the most read, and/or the most emailed. The Times also has a list, updated hourly, of the “most blogged.”

These lists put a new spin on the idea of word-of-mouth or grassroots. It used to be that one person told five (or fifty or even five hundred), and they who were told in turn told others, who told others, and so forth. In that scenario, the telling takes place amongst the audience or consumers. With these lists, supported by the automated aggregation of data, the publisher or originator is now a direct and ongoing participant in the propagation. I’m not sure how that is going to change things, but I suspect it will have some impact down the road. I’ll bet Malcolm Gladwell would have an opinion about this.

As always, time will tell. Meanwhile, what do you think?

Hoisted By My Own Petard

I received the following email from someone who calls himself my friend:

One of the gimmicks I detest most is the “$99 value, yours for only $24.99,”…

vs.

Men, Women, and Girl Singers
Retail Price: $14.95
Online Sale Price: $13.46

That’s all it said, and the subject line was “LOL”

It had me scratching my head for a minute or three. The detested gimmick part came from my post on Friday, but $13.46? Where did that come from? I sell a few copies of my own book from time to time, but I don’t sell at a discount. I called my friend. “Where’d you find that?” I asked. Now he really was laughing out loud. “You posted the link on your site.”

DUH.

After kicking myself three times and wishing for home, I tried to wiggle out of culpability – after all, I didn’t come up with the price; that was my friends at ejazzlines.

“You cash the checks?” he asked.

Hoisted by my own petard.

It’s a clichéd phrase, and we know what it means, but do we really use the expression correctly? And what, exactly, is a petard?

The word: I have always assumed that a petard was a rope. I fantasized that it was a nautical term, imagining a hanging by pirates at sea — I don’t know where I got that idea. I thought that to be hoisted by ones own petard was akin to being given enough rope to hang oneself. But a petard is not a rope, it’s a bomb. My Visual Thesaurus by ThinkMap says that a petard is an explosive device from Medieval days (sometime between 300 and 1500 AD) used to break down as gate or wall. My Oxford English Dictionary on CD-ROM is more specific, defining it as “A small bomb made of a metal or wooden box filled with powder, used to blow in a door etc. or to make a hole in a wall,” and citing first use as mid sixteenth century (specifically between 1530 and 1569). The derivation? Péter meaning “break wind.”

The expression: “Hoist with one’s own petard” was coined by Shakespeare in Hamlet (sometime between 1600 and 1602) A Wikipedia entry explains

The phrase is usually misquoted as “see the engineer hoist by his own petard” and is taken to mean “the hangman hanged with his own rope,”… Hamlet’s actual meaning is “cause the bomb maker to be blown into the air with his own bomb,” metaphorically turning the tables on Claudius, whose messengers are killed instead of Hamlet.

Wikipedia also asserts that “a petard was a 19th Century animal trap, consisting of a rope and a bent branch that caught the desired beast by one leg as it stepped into a loop in the rope and pulled it up into the air.” However, I can not find any corroboration for this other than some online chatter that seems to have proliferated the aforementioned definition intact. There is no such mention in any of my reference books.

In any case, the gist is being ruined by one’s own devices, whatever that device may be…bomb, rope, or poison pen.

Advice

I came across the following in an old issue (Fall 2005) of the Author’s Guild Bulletin:

The late E.B. White wrote to Linda H. Davis, young author of a biography about White’s wife, Katherine White: “Advice from this elderly practioner is to forget publishers and just roll a sheet of copy paper into your machine and get lost in the project. Write about it by day, and dream about it by night.”

Practical advice is a good thing. Proverbial wisdom, on the other hand, is more difficult to apply:

If you want your dreams to come true, don’t sleep. – Yiddish proverb

If you want your eggs hatched, sit on them yourself. – Haitian proverb

Am I A Shameless Marketer?

A friend sent me a link to a web site called and that rekindled my ongoing ever-simmering debate about how and why I do what I do. Usually this is an internal trialogue amongst me, myself, and I, but occasionally it gets aired and argued with friends, family, and/or colleagues. In global terms the opposing forces are art and commerce, or altruism and commerce.

I followed the link my friend sent and found for sale the secrets of successful blogging and simple steps that will lead you to profitability. I imagine that plenty of people will buy this, but I’m not one of them. I don’t respond well to hard sell, and gimmicks turn me off. One of the gimmicks I detest most is the “$99 value, yours for only $24.99,” but I think what bothered me most in this case relates more to the content than the sales hype.

First of all, there is lots of free information about blogging and how to do it. Second, it offends my sensibilities as a blogger because there is a blogging community and we help one another, advise one another, and promote one another…for free. (I’d even bet that soliciting cross promotion is one of the “secrets” being sold.) On the other hand, I admire this person’s salesmanship and marketing savvy. But as I told my friend, “I can’t go that route. I guess this is why I will always be a starving artist.”

My friend wrote back:

The interesting thing about blogging is how it can be seen by some as a marketing opportunity, while the concept itself is about as far from commercial as you can get. [A mutual friend of ours] put together a blog on investing a couple of month ago, which he abandoned shortly thereafter because “nobody was reading it on a regular basis.” For him, it apparently was blog=audience. For [the blogging secrets guru], it is more blatantly blog=list (revenue).

I replied:

Don’t get me wrong, I do see blogging as a marketing opportunity, but for me it is one of pr, exposure, building “a fan base” … (eee gad, I’m speaking marketese) For my sensibilities, blogs-as-sales-tools should be more subtle, with an eye toward potential cash in the future for products that my “fans” will buy because they are interested in that product/subject/book, not cash from the blog itself — I hope never to sell ad space on my blog and always to give content that is interesting to my readers (which by my definition means only occasionally may I post a hard sell of my own — i.e. “click here to buy my book“)

My friend says, “You shameless marketeer, you.” What do you say?